Conclusion:
The Systems Theory of Human Evolutionary Behavior breaks human behavior down into an interaction of five simple systems that interact with five outside factors in eight basic ways. This gives us eighteen points of reference to define the evolutionary functions of human behavior.
The Theory of Evolutionary Relativity applies spiritual/emotional energy to those eighteen points of reference as a virtual form of energy. The universal brain structure of our species then directs energy through those five simple systems to create our perceptions of the most effective means of preserving the survival of our DNA.
This reduction of evolutionary science carries numerous benefits for the vast majority of humanity who don’t base their perception of the world exclusively on science. In order for an evolutionary solution to world problems to succeed, it must be presented to the public in an readily understandable manner, it must be simple enough to be easily memorable, it must prove useful within the contexts of people’s day-to-day lives, it must include clear courses of action for people to pursue to help solve world problems, and it must be able to predict good chances of success at solving those problems in readily understandable terms. The Systems Theory of Human Evolutionary Behavior and Theory of Evolutionary Relativity do all of these things.
Based on the success I have had already at using The Theory of Evolutionary Relativity to teach evolutionary science in common sense terms to anyone who is generally open minded and interested in playing a part in helping to solve problems in the world, it is obvious that if valid evolutionary science can be brought to the public in whatever terms they do relate to the world, the success of an evolution revolution solution will be well within reach.
Any time I use the Theory of Evolutionary Relativity to give lectures on evolutionary science, whether I do it in religious or entertainment terms, my audience members always have the same two reactions:
“Oh wow, I’ve already thought of all that stuff, but you figured out how to bring it all together and put it into words,” and something to the effect of,
“All of this is so obvious, why should anybody need to write an 200,000 word book to prove it to scientists?”









