A New (and Old) Definition of Patriotism:
Once upon a time, a bunch of patriots fought the Revolutionary War and won our independence from Britain. Now that our country has been threatened once again, patriots are supposedly people who fight to protect America once again. So why is it that the Patriot Act so badly undermines the First Amendment and so many of our other Constitutional rights that the original patriots fought so hard to establish in the first place? Could this be yet another example of powerful people attempting to twist public opinion to their own advantage by attaching words that most people interpret a certain way to a set of rules that accomplish exactly the opposite of what that word stands for?
In George Orwell’s book Nineteen-Eighty-Four, the government of the empire of Oceana divides up its functions among four ministries: The Ministry of Truth, the Ministry of Peace, the Ministry of Love, and the Ministry of Plenty, which basically meant the “Ministry of Brainwashing People”, the “Ministry of Waging War”, the “Ministry of Stomping People Down”, and the “Ministry of Keeping Everyone Poor”. Of course, Nineteen-Eighty-Four is a work of fiction, so what does that have to do with real life, right? I mean, obviously, George Orwell possessed some kind of magical powers that enabled him to write books that people are still reading 60 years later, even though nobody has the slightest clue what the f*ck he’s talking about, right?
The problem with trying to defend America by undermining the most important principles it’s founded upon is that George W. Bush may be good at political aikido on a small scale, but Osama bin Ladin is good at it on a much larger scale. (Or at least, let’s pretend that’s true for the moment.) President Bush is trying to play checkers while Osama bin Ladin is playing chess. Osama bin Ladin has posed a threat to America, and has forced President Bush to react to it. If President Bush uses the existing apparatus of our political system to try to keep America safe in the short term, he’s going to destroy America in the long term—which is exactly what Osama bin Ladin wants. In America, our political, legal, and economic systems function a certain way, and a lot of people have a problem with it, because those things are constructed to serve the needs of humanity according to an obsolete understanding of humanity. (I’m sure Osama didn’t figure all this out in terms of all this “evolution” heresy, but however he did it, he figured out enough about humanity to be able to do this, just like Mohammed figured out enough about humanity to build a religion that 1/4 of the world’s population are still following 1500 years later.)
In America, the people in power benefit a lot from the way things are set up. The people who have a problem with the way things work are people who aren’t in power. The people in power figure out how to use the resources they have available to benefit themselves, just like people have done throughout our evolution. The people who aren’t in power also use the resources they have available to benefit themselves as well as they can, even though they don’t have as many resources as the people in power. One of the resources the people who aren’t in power have is the First Amendment. If we undermine the First Amendment with the so-called “Patriot” Act, we change the resources each group has available: The powerful people who have lots of resources already gain even more resources, and the people who are doing the best they can with the few resources they have available, lose resources. Specifically, if we undermine the First Amendment with the so-called “Patriot” Act, the people who are trying to change America to make it serve humanity better—and who consequently threaten what the people in power have—lose their ability to find peaceful, constructive ways to make America function better. If we give the people in power even more resources to use against the people who threaten their power, don’t you think they’re going to use them? That’s not what the “Patriot” Act was intended for, but it’s an evolutionarily mathematical inevitability that it’s going to be used that way. Osama doesn’t need to destroy America; he only needs to push on Americans just right to make them destroy America themselves.
I think Teddy Roosevelt said it best when he said, “Patriotism means standing by the country. It does not mean standing by the president.”









